Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) need access to working capital, equipment financing, and expansion loans, but assessing these businesses can be difficult for banks. Limited financial histories, inconsistent records, and changing cash flows make credit assessment more demanding.
As application volumes rise, manual reviews can place additional pressure on already stretched risk teams. Modern SME lending software can help organize credit workflows and borrower information, but lenders must also address the underlying challenges of assessing risk at scale.
1. SME Credit Assessment Requires More Than a Credit Score
Assessing an established large company often involves audited financial statements, detailed reporting, and a longer borrowing history. Smaller businesses may not have the same documentation. Some rely on seasonal income, informal accounting practices, or a small number of customers.
These conditions make it harder for risk teams to build a complete picture of a borrower’s financial position. A business might report healthy revenue but face cash flow problems because customers pay late. Another might have limited credit history despite maintaining a viable operation.
The Bank for International Settlements explored these challenges in its February 2025 bulletin, How far can digital innovation improve credit to small firms in emerging market economies?. The research identifies limited financial histories and a lack of collateral as important barriers to SME credit access. It also examines how digital data and new lending models could help address these constraints.
However, alternative data does not automatically produce better credit decisions. Lenders still need to establish whether the information is reliable, relevant, and appropriate for the intended assessment.
2. Application Volumes Can Outgrow Manual Processes
When SME lending expands, risk teams must review more applications, verify more documents, investigate exceptions, and coordinate with more departments.
If these activities depend on email, spreadsheets, and disconnected systems, processing capacity becomes difficult to scale. Employees may spend substantial time checking whether documents have arrived, reconciling borrower information, and requesting missing details instead of evaluating credit risk.
The result can be a growing backlog. Experienced analysts may spend time on administrative tasks while complex applications wait for review.
The OECD’s Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2026 report provides useful context. Across the countries covered by its Scoreboard, the median flow of new SME lending increased by 5.7% in 2024 after declining by 9% in 2023. Despite this recovery, outstanding SME loan stocks broadly stagnated, and financing conditions remained challenging.
These figures do not establish that lending growth has outpaced risk-team capacity across the banking sector. They do show why lenders need to manage application processing, credit quality, and financing demand together rather than assume that higher lending volumes automatically indicate a healthier market.
3. Fragmented Data Makes Risk Assessment Harder
Credit decisions depend on information from multiple sources, including financial statements, bank transactions, tax records, credit bureaus, invoices, and existing loan accounts.
When these records sit in separate systems, analysts must assemble the information manually. The process can introduce errors, create inconsistent borrower profiles, and make it difficult to identify changes in financial health.
Fragmentation also limits visibility across the portfolio. A lender may struggle to compare applications consistently, identify repeated patterns, or recognize emerging repayment problems if different teams use different data sources and assessment procedures.
The Reserve Bank of India’s Annual Report 2024-25 describes the Unified Lending Interface (ULI), which connects lenders and data service providers through standardized APIs. By March 31, 2025, the platform had 44 participating lenders, including banks and non-banking financial companies, using more than 60 data services across 12 loan journeys, including MSME lending.
The RBI’s account illustrates how standardized data connections can reduce the need for multiple individual integrations. For lenders, the broader lesson is that effective credit assessment depends partly on the quality and accessibility of the information reaching risk teams.
4. Faster Decisions Must Not Weaken Credit Controls
Pressure to reduce turnaround times can encourage lenders to automate more stages of underwriting. Automated checks can identify missing information, calculate financial ratios, apply policy rules, and route applications according to defined criteria.
However, automation introduces its own risks if lenders cannot explain, validate, or monitor the resulting decisions.
For example, a credit model may perform well on historical applications but produce less reliable results when economic conditions change or the lender enters a new borrower segment. A system may also treat incomplete or inaccurate data as reliable unless validation checks are built into the process.
Risk teams therefore need to distinguish between tasks that can be automated consistently and decisions that require closer scrutiny.
A practical approach includes:
Automating document completeness checks and routine data validation.
Applying consistent eligibility rules to straightforward applications.
Routing unusual cases and policy exceptions to experienced analysts.
Recording the data, rules, and model outputs associated with decisions.
Monitoring repayment outcomes and changes in model performance.
The objective is to reduce repetitive work while preserving meaningful human oversight where the risk warrants it.
5. Risk Monitoring Must Continue After Disbursement
Credit assessment does not end when a loan is approved. SMEs can experience rapid changes in cash flow, customer demand, input costs, and payment cycles. A borrower that appeared financially stable at origination may encounter repayment difficulties months later.
Risk teams need reliable information about arrears, repayment behavior, account activity, and changes in borrower circumstances. If servicing and underwriting operate in separate systems, identifying warning signs may require manual reconciliation.
The International Finance Corporation’s 2025 handbook, MSME Banking in the Digital Era, examines how digital channels, data analytics, and new financial service models can help institutions serve micro, small, and medium-sized businesses. It also discusses longstanding barriers, including limited collateral and financial records.
For lenders, this highlights the importance of looking beyond the initial application. Digital tools can support ongoing monitoring, but their value depends on reliable data, clear escalation procedures, and timely action when repayment risks emerge.
6. Technology Must Support the Entire Credit Workflow
Adding another tool may solve a specific problem without addressing the wider operational burden. A document extraction application, credit scoring model, or loan origination system may improve one stage while leaving employees to transfer information manually between departments.
Before investing in technology, lenders should map their credit workflows and identify where delays, repeated checks, and inconsistent decisions occur.
They should then assess whether prospective systems can:
Integrate with existing banking, accounting, and data services.
Maintain consistent borrower records across lending stages.
Automate routine tasks without hiding important decision logic.
Provide audit trails and support regulatory reporting.
Monitor portfolio performance and flag emerging risks.
Scale across products and borrower segments without requiring unnecessary manual work.
Technology should be evaluated against measurable outcomes, including processing time, error rates, analyst workload, approval consistency, and portfolio performance. Faster processing alone is insufficient if it comes at the expense of sound credit assessment.
Conclusion
SME lending presents a demanding combination of incomplete financial information, varied borrower profiles, growing data requirements, and the need for timely decisions. When manual processes cannot keep pace, risk teams may spend more time managing information than evaluating borrowers.
Lenders can address these pressures by improving data access, standardizing credit workflows, automating appropriate tasks, and strengthening ongoing portfolio monitoring. The goal is to help risk teams assess more applications without losing the consistency, accountability, and judgment that responsible lending requires.
Copyright © 2026 California Business Journal. All Rights Reserved.
For California Business Journal Disclaimers, go to https://calbizjournal.com/terms-conditions/.
