Since California is home to some of the world’s biggest tech companies, we can’t help but wonder: Could these laws become the global standard?
What This Means for AI Platforms
We’re witnessing AI’s impact far beyond California, it’s shaping industries worldwide. As AI-powered services become more common, companies must adapt if they want to continue operating in California. For global businesses, that means ensuring our models align with these new regulations, whether by increasing transparency, tweaking algorithms, or rethinking how we handle user data.
We see this shift happening across multiple industries – in finance, AI helps with fraud detection and automated trading, but with stricter transparency rules, banks and financial institutions will need to adjust their risk models. In healthcare, AI-powered diagnostics and patient data analysis are becoming essential, but with that comes the responsibility to ensure ethical data use and compliance.
Even in online gaming and casinos, AI plays a growing role. We use it to detect fraud, personalize gaming experiences, and improve security. Gambling expert Matt Bastock says that if you’re in the US, chances are that offshore casino sites are the only internationally available platforms. These online platforms leverage AI to personalize games and bonuses according to player preferences, ensuring an immersive gaming experience.
Given California’s status as a tech powerhouse, whatever happens here is likely to set a precedent that influences AI regulations worldwide.
In the past year alone, lawmakers have introduced several AI-related bills, and Governor Gavin Newsom signed 18 of them into law. These focus on everything from fairness to accountability and keeping misinformation in check. One of the most significant, Assembly Bill 2013 (AB 2013), requires companies to disclose the data used to train their AI. This is a big development since AI models are only as good as the data they learn from. This law, however, pushes companies to be more transparent about how they build their models.
Not everyone is happy about these changes. Some argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and make California less attractive for AI startups. The big question is, will these laws create better, more ethical AI, or will they just make things harder?
Finding the Right Balance
One of the more talked-about laws, Senate Bill 896 (SB 896), is all about fairness in hiring. We’ve all heard the stories about companies using AI to filter job applications, but these systems aren’t always perfect. Sometimes they unintentionally favor certain groups over others, and that’s a problem. This law aims to ensure AI hiring tools don’t discriminate based on race or gender.
But not every proposed law made it through the process. Senate Bill 1047 (SB 1047), which would have required stricter safety tests for advanced AI models, didn’t make the cut. Governor Newsom vetoed it, saying it could create too many roadblocks for AI development. It’s a tough balancing act: making sure AI is safe and fair without stifling the very innovation that could drive progress.
However, businesses must find a way to protect sensitive data while remaining competitive in a rapidly changing tech landscape. They highlight that companies should “implement robust data protection measures to safeguard sensitive information and comply with regulations”—a message that ties into California’s broader AI regulation goals.
How California Stacks Up Against the Rest of the World
California isn’t the only place making moves on AI regulation. The European Union’s AI Act, which is set to take effect in 2025, is one of the most detailed pieces of AI legislation out there. It categorizes AI systems by risk level and applies strict rules to high-risk applications, such as how AI is used in law enforcement or finance.
China’s focus is a little different. They’re more concerned with AI-generated content and deepfakes, and they’ve already required that AI-generated content be clearly labeled. Developers also have to register their models with the authorities before deploying them.
Compared to the EU and China, California’s laws are a bit more laid-back. They aren’t as strict as the EU’s, but they’re definitely more proactive than what we’re seeing from the U.S. federal government. Because some of the biggest tech companies call California home, what happens here could end up setting the standard for AI regulation around the globe.
Conclusion
These laws are still new, so it’s too early to say if they’ll work as planned. If they help create more trustworthy AI without slowing down innovation, other regions will likely adopt similar regulations. But if these laws end up being too much of a burden for businesses, we might see other places take a different route.
Copyright © 2025 California Business Journal. All Rights Reserved.
For California Business Journal Disclaimers, go to https://calbizjournal.com/terms-conditions/.
