A rejected submittal on a California commercial project costs far more than the paperwork it takes to fix. Every rejection delays the point where materials can be ordered, and that delay compounds into longer carrying costs, more exposure to price increases, labor that has to be rescheduled, and, on regulated projects such as hospitals, added pressure on agency review timelines. Very little of that cost shows up as a single line item, which makes it easy for owners and developers to underestimate.
Why delay costs more in the current market
The price of any delay depends on the market around the project. TheAGC and Sage 2026 Construction Hiring and Business Outlook found that 34 percent of firms said project financing was unavailable or too expensive, and 63 percent reported that an owner had postponed or canceled a project in the previous six months.
What a submittal package is and why it controls procurement
Before most materials and equipment can be purchased, the contractor has to show the design team that what it plans to install matches the contract documents. That proof comes in the form of submittals: manufacturer product data, shop drawings, samples, and test reports, organized by specification section.
Developers new to commercial construction often ask what is a submittal package and why it sits between design and purchasing. In short, it is the bundle of those documents for a given scope of work, assembled by the contractor or subcontractor and reviewed by the architect and engineers. The reviewer returns it with an action such as approved, approved as noted, revise and resubmit, or rejected. Generally, only the first two allow procurement to proceed.
Where the hidden costs come from
Schedule time that is expensive to recover
Carrying costs for the owner
Rework and field risk
Team capacity
Decisions made under pressure
Financing pressure
34% of contractors in the AGC and Sage 2026 outlook said project financing was unavailable or too expensive. On projects carrying expensive capital, time lost to resubmittals is paid for in interest.
California-specific pressure points
Energy code transitions
California updates its building energy standards on a regular cycle. The California Energy Commission's 2025 Building Energy Efficiency Standards took effect January 1, 2026, and buildings whose permit applications are filed on or after that date must comply with the 2025 Energy Code. During a transition, a contractor may run projects under different code versions at the same time, and product data that satisfied one project may not satisfy the next. Mechanical equipment, lighting controls, and envelope products are among the submittals that typically need to document energy code compliance.
Hospital and other agency-reviewed work
Healthcare construction faces additional review layers. Construction Dive's report on California's hospital seismic deadline notes that general acute care hospital buildings must meet seismic standards by January 1, 2030, and that projects need to account for the Department of Health Care Access and Information's (HCAI) seismic compliance planning and review requirements. On projects working toward a fixed regulatory deadline, a rejected submittal consumes schedule margin that may not exist.
What owners and developers can ask for
Owners do not need to manage submittals directly to reduce their cost. A few requests at the start of a project go a long way:
A submittal schedule tied to the procurement schedule, with long-lead items first.
Confirmation that the general contractor checks each package against the plans and specifications before it goes to the design team.
A simple rejection report showing how many packages were returned and why, reviewed in owner meetings.
Defined review periods in the contract for both the contractor and the design team.
Early coordination on substitutions, so alternate products are reviewed before they become urgent.
Clarity on which energy code and standards apply to the project's permit, so every submittal is reviewed against the right version.
Treating submittal quality as cost control
Owners usually focus cost control on bids, change orders, and contingency. Submittal quality deserves a place on that list. A package that is right the first time protects the schedule, keeps purchasing on track, and avoids the slow, mostly invisible costs that build up when documents go back and forth.
On California projects, where energy code updates, agency review, financing costs, and labor constraints all add friction, that discipline is worth asking for from the first project meeting.
The most useful question an owner can ask is a simple one: how many packages came back last month, and why? The answer says a great deal about whether the project is on track.
Copyright © 2026 California Business Journal. All Rights Reserved.
For California Business Journal Disclaimers, go to https://calbizjournal.com/terms-conditions/.
